PRO: DNA record keeping is an invasion of privacy
Points:
>Disrimaination to many
~Eugenics
~Hitler
>Penalties
~Laws are not clear
-inappropriate release of information to employers
-employment discrimination
-higher medical cost
>Human Choice
>Taking DNA records at birth
~violates medical ethics
~new mothers in bad positions
DEBATE:
Invasion of privacy is an issue that we face from day to day but have you ever thought about it being more than skin deep? You may be concerned about this but have you ever considered the privacy of your DNA? Think about it in this way--your DNA is your own unique makeup and therefore it is you, so when people judge your genes they are judging you!------------
DNA record keeping has played a key role in the discrimination of people in the United States since the early 1900's. Eugenics is a philosophy that encourages the manipulation of human traits through the use of social or technical intervention. This led to the involuntary sterilization of "genetically unfit" people. The mentally ill, autistic, specific races, etc are just a few prevented from passing on their genes. This outrageous discrimination would not have come about if their DNA privacy was never invaded.--If this has not convinced you enough, just know that Hitler used the same philosophy as a rationale to exterminate the Jewish Race. Although the government has taken certain actions to prevent genetic discrimination many people still choose not to undergo genetic testing because the laws are not clear regarding the privacy of individual's genetic records. Information is often inappropriately released to employers resulting in employee discrimantion and higher medical cost.--People do not choose their genteic makeup and therefore should not be penalized for it. To do so is the ultimate invasion of genetic privacy! An individuals genetic information is a private matter and it should be the choice of the individual to give it out or not. A person should have the right to control their own personal DNA. A recent study at Harvard and Stanford Universities revealed that over 200 cases of discrimination has occurred because of genes that individuals carried or were suspected of carrying. This invasion of privacy is a devasting feeling and experience that one should not have to endure. Many people feel that DNA record keeping is an invasion of privacy. To elaborate, the Open Rights Group emphatically opposes the collection of the populations DNA at birth, and can see no circumstance under which this should be considered. Such an action violates medical ethics, puts new mothers in an ethically unacceptable position, and is a gross invasion of privacy.---
But I leave you with the question- How would you feel if you were negatively affected becuase of someone elses invasion of your privacy?
Bibliography
http://cpab.info/Documents/Gina_bam_5-22-08.htm
http://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/DNA_Consultation
Prentice Hall pg 354
Partner: Lizzie Paluso
Argument
CON: DNA record keeping is an invasion of privacy
>Remains of soldiers could not be found if their DNA wasn't previously stored
>Investigators could not determine suspects of a crime, some of which may be a potential threat to citizens
>Althought some says it allows the government to access private health records, whats the harm? >The government can use it as a helpful protective tool and it really has no true harm to anyone. >One should have confidence in their behavior that it shouldn't matter if a record of their DNA is kept.
>Having someone volunteer to have their DNA tested by different research companies can help us determine ways to fight off diseases we may have never been able to before.
